Timeline for confused with conditionals
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2016 at 17:52 | history | edited | M.A.R. |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 20, 2015 at 20:43 | history | edited | Nathan Tuggy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags; deleted 30 characters in body
|
| Jul 24, 2015 at 20:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackEnglishLL/status/624676100350849024 | ||
| Jul 24, 2015 at 16:01 | answer | added | Chad | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 24, 2015 at 14:42 | history | edited | arash | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Jul 24, 2015 at 14:42 | comment | added | arash | Actually, as you said, the tenses were the problem. Articles were my mistakes. I changed them. tnx! | |
| Jul 24, 2015 at 14:32 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | I am not sure about your main question about the tense for go, but as a side point, when you use go by to talk about a generic method of transportation, you don't use an article. It should simply be go by jet or went by jet. If you want to emphasize a specific vehicle, you could say go in a jet. | |
| Jul 24, 2015 at 14:02 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 24, 2015 at 14:12 | |||||
| Jul 24, 2015 at 14:01 | history | asked | arash | CC BY-SA 3.0 |