Timeline for Which one should I use who or whom?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2015 at 0:21 | vote | accept | dreamcrash | ||
| Oct 8, 2015 at 16:00 | comment | added | StoneyB on hiatus | @Araucaria I think they're the same thing in different uses; but the wh- words are distributed differently. "Who is concerned with efficiency is what we're trying to find out." | |
| Oct 8, 2015 at 15:38 | comment | added | Araucaria - Not here any more. | @StoneyB I'd never thought about that. Do you find that persuasive evidence that the two are different? Actually, my view on this was the same as yoursish until you pointed that out. Now I'm musing. I think it was F.E. who held that they're definitely distinct ... Yes, I'll stick that in when I've finished a post that I'm working on on the dark side. | |
| Oct 8, 2015 at 15:33 | comment | added | StoneyB on hiatus | +1 But I seem to remember you hold to the distinction between fused relatives and embedded questions. Since Subj-who is acceptable in EQ, do you think you might want to toss in a footnote about that? | |
| Oct 8, 2015 at 14:20 | vote | accept | dreamcrash | ||
| Oct 8, 2015 at 14:29 | |||||
| Oct 8, 2015 at 14:09 | history | edited | Araucaria - Not here any more. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Oct 8, 2015 at 13:58 | history | edited | Araucaria - Not here any more. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Oct 8, 2015 at 13:52 | history | answered | Araucaria - Not here any more. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |