Tweeted twitter.com/StackEnglishLL/status/700666855053250561
3 deleted 2 characters in body; edited title; edited tags
source | link

can the Can inversion be happen in ralativea relative clause with a preposition?

One company developed what it called a 'technology shelf', created by a few enginerrs, on which [was placed/were placed/placed] possible techinical solutions that other teams might use in the future.

According to the guildeline, it is said that 'were placed' was grammatically correct, because the subject of the sentence is 'possible technical solutions' as inversion happened in the relative clause.

However, I feel somewhat awkward about the it, and still can't understand that the inversion could happen in the relative clause with preposition.

If so, why not always does the inversion happen in relative clause with prepostion?

can the inversion be happen in ralative clause with preposition?

One company developed what it called a 'technology shelf', created by a few enginerrs, on which [was placed/were placed/placed] possible techinical solutions that other teams might use in the future.

According to the guildeline, it is said that 'were placed' was grammatically correct, because the subject of the sentence is 'possible technical solutions' as inversion happened in the relative clause.

However, I feel somewhat awkward about the it, and still can't understand that the inversion could happen in the relative clause with preposition.

If so, why not always does the inversion happen in relative clause with prepostion?

Can inversion happen in a relative clause with a preposition?

One company developed what it called a 'technology shelf', created by a few enginerrs, on which [was placed/were placed/placed] possible techinical solutions that other teams might use in the future.

According to the guildeline, it is said that 'were placed' was grammatically correct, because the subject of the sentence is 'possible technical solutions' as inversion happened in the relative clause.

However, I feel somewhat awkward about the it, and still can't understand that the inversion could happen in the relative clause with preposition.

If so, why not always does the inversion happen in relative clause with prepostion?

2 Spelling correction
source | link

One company developed what it called a 'technology shelf', created by a few enginerrs, on which [was placed/were placed/placed] possible techinical solutions that other teams might use in the future.

According to the guildlineguildeline, it is said that 'were placed' was grammatically correct, because the subject of the sentence is 'possible techinicaltechnical solutions' as inverstioninversion happened in the relative clause.

However, I feel somewhat akwardawkward about the it, and still can't understand that the inversion could happen in the realativerelative clause with preposition.

If so, why not always does the inversion happen in relative clause with prepostion?

One company developed what it called a 'technology shelf', created by a few enginerrs, on which [was placed/were placed/placed] possible techinical solutions that other teams might use in the future.

According to the guildline, it is said that 'were placed' was grammatically correct, because the subject of the sentence is 'possible techinical solutions' as inverstion happened in the relative clause.

However, I feel somewhat akward about the it, and still can't understand that the inversion could happen in the realative clause with preposition.

If so, why not always does the inversion happen in relative clause with prepostion?

One company developed what it called a 'technology shelf', created by a few enginerrs, on which [was placed/were placed/placed] possible techinical solutions that other teams might use in the future.

According to the guildeline, it is said that 'were placed' was grammatically correct, because the subject of the sentence is 'possible technical solutions' as inversion happened in the relative clause.

However, I feel somewhat awkward about the it, and still can't understand that the inversion could happen in the relative clause with preposition.

If so, why not always does the inversion happen in relative clause with prepostion?

1
source | link

can the inversion be happen in ralative clause with preposition?

One company developed what it called a 'technology shelf', created by a few enginerrs, on which [was placed/were placed/placed] possible techinical solutions that other teams might use in the future.

According to the guildline, it is said that 'were placed' was grammatically correct, because the subject of the sentence is 'possible techinical solutions' as inverstion happened in the relative clause.

However, I feel somewhat akward about the it, and still can't understand that the inversion could happen in the realative clause with preposition.

If so, why not always does the inversion happen in relative clause with prepostion?