Timeline for Which makes a stronger suggestion: subjunctive or should clause?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 15, 2015 at 0:38 | history | suggested | Lucky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
comparative, sentence structure
|
| Apr 14, 2015 at 22:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 15, 2015 at 0:38 | |||||
| Aug 16, 2013 at 10:46 | vote | accept | Listenever | ||
| Aug 15, 2013 at 16:03 | answer | added | July.Tech | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 10, 2013 at 8:58 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackEnglishLL/status/366121278849032192 | ||
| Aug 9, 2013 at 16:46 | comment | added | Daniel | I don't think either is stronger. | |
| Aug 9, 2013 at 14:24 | comment | added | StoneyB on hiatus | Either is just dandy. Be is probably more common in US, but is gaining new life in UK. The choice is really idiolectal: I may write be and see, first, my client change it to is and then the client's lawyers change it to should be. | |
| Aug 9, 2013 at 13:40 | history | asked | Listenever | CC BY-SA 3.0 |