Timeline for Article usage in scientific context
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2016 at 23:49 | comment | added | Alan Carmack | Get rid of the the before large volume expansion. | |
| Aug 26, 2016 at 19:40 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 19:32 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackEnglishLL/status/758384589907820544 | ||
| Jul 27, 2016 at 19:29 | comment | added | gattsbr |
"and large volume expansion of the sulfur (~80%) cathode" so just remove as and add the before sulfur
|
|
| Jul 27, 2016 at 17:08 | answer | added | LawrenceC | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 15:51 | comment | added | James K | Sulfur cathode sounds correct (if you are writing for an american audience, otherwise sulphur), but science question... sulphur is not a conductor, so how does it function as a cathode? | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 14:48 | comment | added | Mark Hubbard | I recommend, "However, Li–S batteries also show several serious defects, including poor conductivity, the large volume expansion (about 80%) of sulfur used as a cathode, and the shuttle effect of intermediate products (lithium polysulfides) during charge/discharge processes." | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 14:39 | comment | added | tosh | @SLC, this seems a better edit, I guess | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 14:32 | comment | added | NibblyPig | In that case I would suggest large volume expansion of the sulfur cathode. | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 14:31 | comment | added | tosh | Thanks SLC for your suggestion, I checked the possibility of your suggestion in the manuscript, but in this article, actually sulfur has been used as a cathode. | |
| S Jul 27, 2016 at 14:24 | history | suggested | Tsundoku | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor edits in description
|
| Jul 27, 2016 at 14:23 | comment | added | NibblyPig | I believe it should be at the cathode or in the cathode. | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 14:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 27, 2016 at 14:24 | |||||
| Jul 27, 2016 at 14:01 | history | edited | stangdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting
|
| Jul 27, 2016 at 13:40 | history | asked | tosh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |