Timeline for Is this omission of the words after "than" correct?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2016 at 13:35 | comment | added | LMS | That is another option, but I wouldn't say that "faster" and "less expensive" are completely equivalent. If you have two algorithms (A1 and A2) that take the same amount of time to finish, but A1 uses 1GB of RAM and A2 uses 2GB, neither is faster but A2 is more expensive. | |
| Aug 7, 2016 at 13:23 | comment | added | TonyK | @LMS: Yes, I agree. Or just "should be faster than". | |
| Aug 7, 2016 at 13:20 | comment | added | LMS | If this is in the context of computer science, stating that it is "less expensive" is also an option: "As a result, calculating the similarities between items should be less expensive than calculating the similarities between users." | |
| Aug 7, 2016 at 13:07 | history | edited | Nathan Tuggy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed (some) typos.
|
| Aug 7, 2016 at 12:43 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 7, 2016 at 13:07 | |||||
| Aug 7, 2016 at 12:42 | history | answered | TonyK | CC BY-SA 3.0 |