0

The following is the opening line from an article of Scientific American.

The amount of time people spend watching television is astonishing. On average, individuals in the industrialized world devote three hours a day to the pursuit—fully half of their leisure time, and more than on any single activity save work and sleep.

As the comparison is to which activity they devote more time, it should be "and more than to any single activity" instead of "and more than on any single activity". Am I wrong?

3
  • You are not wrong. But that doesn't make the question very interesting for future readers. Errors often occur in English writing, just like in writing in any other language.
    – The Photon
    Commented Jul 29, 2017 at 14:04
  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the answer is uninteresting.
    – The Photon
    Commented Jul 29, 2017 at 14:05
  • Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    – J.R.
    Commented Jul 30, 2017 at 23:29

2 Answers 2

1

A writer with OCD would likely agree with OP because, while the grammar is correct, it's inconsistent, and this sort of inconsistency is arguably worth criticizing. If we remove the comment about leisure time, it becomes more apparent:

On average, individuals in the industrialized world devote three hours a day to the pursuit—more than to any other save work and sleep.

0

Yes, you’re wrong.

There’s nothing wrong with the original wording. In the phrase:

more than on any single activity

the idiomatic phrase being used is “(to) spend time on an activity.”

That part of the phrase isn’t making a comparison, it’s talking about the total hours amassed watching television.

2
  • But the phrase "spend time [on]" is never used in the quoted passage. The writer starts with the phrase "devote [time] to" and then somehow connects to it with "on" out of the blue. The quoted passage is indeed poorly formed.
    – The Photon
    Commented Jul 29, 2017 at 14:02
  • @ThePhoton - Individuals in the industrialized world devote three hours a day to watching television. The preposition to doesn't need to "connect" to anything.
    – J.R.
    Commented Jul 30, 2017 at 23:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .