Jake has watched TV every night this week (recently and repeatedly).
Why we use present perfect simple instead of present perfect continuous in this example? Isn't it incorrect?
Jake watched TV every night this week.
Jake has watched TV every night this week.
Jake has been watching TV every night this week.
None of these are incorrect.
The first expresses a past-tense action. The second expresses a present-tense state which results from an action. The third expresses a present-tense state which results from an action that has a duration.
We haven't even covered every possibility yet. We might also wish to consider:
Jake was watching TV every night this week.
This expresses a past-tense action that had a duration.
None of these are incorrect, but none of these are equivalent. They do express different things. They do have different implications.
Jake watched TV every night this week.
Jake has watched TV every night this week.
To my native-reader's eye, these two don't imply anything about the future. Perhaps Jake will continue this habit. Perhaps he won't. I don't see a reason in the grammar to infer either possibility.
Jake has been watching TV every night this week.
This combination of present tense and continuous aspect implies that the action will continue. I suspect that Jake will watch TV every night next week. That is to say, he probably hasn't finished watching TV.
Jake was watching TV every night this week.
Jake had been watching TV every night this week.
These combinations of past tense and continuous aspect implies that the action has ended. Without further context, I suspect that Jake won't watch TV every night next week.
English is so confusing (°∆°"). I've just asked my teacher about that problem and he said we can only use the present perfect simple for that sentence