The other day I had to read a simple story and then summarize it briefly to my teacher. At one part I said something like:
The little boy was scared, so he ran where was Regina.
My teacher told me that I said it wrong, beacuse the listener will think that I'm asking where was Regina. Instead, it should be:
The little boy was scared, so he ran where Regina was.
But I don't think it's completely true. What draws my attention is that long ago, I asked this question on the Signal Processing site and wrote that:
Assuming E(f) constant (uniformely distributed over all frequencies), the noise should remain the same if I sample at the Nyquist frequency or at a higher one because are the anti aliasing filters what eliminate most of the noise of the spectrum by attenuating frequencies higher than the Nyquist frequencies, while the noise in the lower frequencies remains impossible to mitigate.
That's the same pattern, ‘are the anti-aliasing filters’ instead of ‘the anti-aliasing filters are’. I don't know if, at that moment, someone realized about that detail but that question wasn't edited by any user. So:
Is my caprice of starting a relative clause with an inversion considered substandard? Should I worry about and try to correct it? Is it common to see on everyday language, either oral or written? Will the natives bully me if I speak using that style?