In each case, a halogen higher in the Group can oxidise the ions of one lower down. For example, chlorine can oxidise the bromide ions (in, for example, potassium bromide solution) to bromine.
Can we omit the here, or does the parenthetical phrase force the use of the definite article before bromide ions?
My edit without the:
In each case, a halogen higher in the Group can oxidise the ions of one lower down. For example, chlorine can oxidise bromide ions (in, for example, potassium bromide solution) to bromine.
Is this okay? Or will such parenthetical phrase always force the use of the where it otherwise could\would have been omitted?
P.S. After posting the question, I read further, and there's a sentence right after the quoted one:
As you have seen above, chlorine can also oxidise iodide ions (in, for example, potassium iodide solution) to iodine.
Here, there's no the before "iodide ions". So the use of the appears to be in free varation. Even if a parenthetical construction allows one to use the, the definite article still could be omitted. Am I right?
Or maybe the use of the definite article here is unrelated to the content of the parentheses?