Take a look on this sentence.

Today 71 years ago US dropped a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima killing over 1000000

Why in this sentence it uses killing, is it a noun and "Hiroshima killing over 1000000" is the noun phrase complement for this sentence?


A noun phrase complement is something that is linked to a noun using the verb be, for example:

Time is a great healer.

time is the subject and a great healer is the noun phrase complement.

Looking at your sentence, there is no be, so killing over 1000000 is not a noun phrase complement.

killing over 100000 is actually a participle clause. It is nonessential information, and should really be separated from the main clause with a comma:

Today 71 years ago US dropped a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima, killing over 1000000

  • 1
    +1 . .. I commend to your attention the Cambridge Grammar's term supplement, which avoids suggesting that the information provided in these syntactically subordinate adjuncts is unimportant. Aug 9 '16 at 10:25
  • I'm wondering hows about this stentence: I'm the one seeing the rainbow ,Here are 13 examples of Donald Trumps being racist so what are the role of seeing and being here? Is it a participle clause or noun phase?
    – TomSawyer
    Aug 19 '16 at 3:39
  • Gerunds act like nouns, participles act like adjectives. "I am the one [that is] seeing the rainbow" - participle, because it is following an omitted is, so it must be adjectival. "Here are 13 examples of Donald Trump's being racist" - gerund, because "Trump's" is a possessive, so it must be followed by a noun. Here is a similar question: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/19041/…
    – JavaLatte
    Aug 19 '16 at 11:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.