0

"Altogether 23 children were have been killed in Lahe township and 13 killed in Nanyun township since June because of this unknown disease," (Source.)

Just read the above sentence on a local "Times" newspaper. I think the usage "were have been" is wrong. What should be the proper usage there?

  • I believe that is the source. Please edit the post if it is incorrect and include sources whenever possible. – Em. Aug 10 '16 at 5:20
  • @Max Thanks, it is the correct source, but I read it on a newspaper and thus unaware of the online source. – kolunar Aug 10 '16 at 5:43
  • 3
    The quote is actually "Altogether 23 children were have been killed in Lahe township and 13 killed in Nanyun township since June because of this unknown disease." The author probably forgot to delete were when he decided to change the tense from simple past to past perfect or vice versa. Can't see any value for subsequent questioners here. – P. E. Dant Aug 10 '16 at 5:57
  • 1
    @kolunar I understand of course, and I applaud your effort to learn. It is no different than if I were trying to learn Burmese! This is not a usage, though. The author meant to write either were or have been and simply neglected to delete one or the other. It's just a typographical error. I hope you will ask many more questions about English usage. – P. E. Dant Aug 10 '16 at 6:23
  • 1
    @P.E.Dant Thanks for your answer, now I can assure my friends that there is no such thing as "were + have been", one less mistake to make. – kolunar Aug 10 '16 at 7:43
3

This is a typo. I'm betting they originally wrote "were", and wanted to delete that and put "have been", but forgot to actually delete "were".

Were have been is not valid English.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.