0

Suppose someone is consulting you about a matter and you are going to tell him that they have to consider the matter from a comprehensive perspective / point of view; which one of the following sentences sounds more natural to you:

-1- First, you have to consider the matter from a comprehensive perspective.

-2- First, you have to have a bird’s eye view about that matter.

-3- First, you have to analyze the matter from a high vantage point.

-4- First, you have to view the matter from a macro level.

All the sentences above are self-made and mean the same for me, but I doubt which ones sound natural or unnatural to a native speaker.

  • First you need an overview. There's nothing wrong with your example #1, but none of the others sound natural to me (I don't think many people would use metaphoric bird's eye view in this way). – FumbleFingers Aug 23 '16 at 12:19
1

Number 2 sounds the most natural to me (American speaker). I guess that's because it uses the colloquial expression, bird's eye view, so it sounds less formal than the others. Although it should be bird's eye view of, not about. Number 1 would be the next most natural, because comprehensive is a more common word than vantage point or macro.

If I were speaking and I needed to express this, I would probably say: "First, you have to look at the big picture."

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.