0

Source

Please read the transcript for reference.

I’ve already heard stories about her grandfather. He was from Scotland; he was a sailor, but not a very good sailor, so he only got as far as Portsmouth, a big navy town on the south coast of England, not very far from Scotland at all.

The bold part seems like an essential phrase to me. Since removing it should not change the meaning, let's see

He was a sailor so he only got as far as Portsmouth.

Then the last two phrases are also non-essential so I avoid writing them. I think it should be like:

He was a sailor, but not a very good sailor so he only got as far as Portsmouth.

A similar one from the same:

But I know that her mum was from somewhere that was Germany , and then became Poland, so she’s really German, I suppose.

Again the bold part seems to be essential to me.

What do you think about these construction?

  • "that then became Poland," – user3169 Aug 28 '16 at 17:08
  • The fence is high, but (it is) not too high, so you can manage to jump over it. It is essential in that it negates an aspect of the preceding predicate. The river is shallow but crocodile-infested. – Tᴚoɯɐuo Aug 28 '16 at 19:59
1

There is no contradiction between being between commas and being essential. You are perhaps thinking of relative clauses, where commenting (non-restrictive, non-essential) clauses are set off with commas. But that distinction only applies for relative clauses.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.