I heard the sentence from a non-native:

He spoke in Greek, which language I could only follow with difficulty.

Here, which attracts my attention! Has it been used correctly? Normally I would say the (very) language.

  • Related: “which” as relative determiner?. – Lawrence Aug 31 '16 at 10:13
  • @Cardinal edited: from a non-native – Juya Aug 31 '16 at 10:14
  • 1
    The sentence makes sense and is grammatically correct, but the construction using which isn't commonly used these days in casual conversation. – Lawrence Aug 31 '16 at 10:18
  • 2
    I think it's grammatical. The relativised element here is not just "which", but the whole object NP "which language", and it's this phrase that derives its interpretation from the antecedent "Greek". I suspect your unease is caused by the fact that "which" most often occurs as an interrogative determiner as in "Which languages do you speak"? In your example, "which" is a determiner, but it's not interrogative. – BillJ Aug 31 '16 at 13:03

No, which begins a new phrase usually. So after which will follow a subject/verb/etc, or those will be elided and implied.

Which can be a pronoun in a question, though.

I took the book off the shelf.

I took which book off the shelf (doesn't work)

You took which book off the shelf? (works)

Did you see the book Jason had? No, I couldn't find which one (= I couldn't find which one Jason had).

Whichever works more like a determiner/article:

I wanted to buy a car today. The one which Jason was talking about.

I wanted to buy whichever car today that Jason was talking about.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    I can't see anything wrong with the OP's example. Wouldn't you consider "which" to be a relative determiner? – BillJ Aug 31 '16 at 13:08
  • 1
    It sounds better if it was said "He spoke in Greek, which is a language I could only follow with difficulty." – LawrenceC Aug 31 '16 at 13:58
  • 1
    I think BillJ is correct, it's just that this usage of "which" is kind of archaic these days. – stangdon Aug 31 '16 at 14:41
  • 1
    Yes, but to be fair to the OP, we were considering the example he cited. Relatives with "which" as a determiner do seem quite rare. Relative determiner "which" only occurs in certain supplementary (non-defining) relatives where the relativised element (including the head noun) has a 'superordinate' NP as antecedent. And supplementary (non-defining) relatives are, I believe, the least frequent type - so maybe those factors contribute to the comparative rarity of such constructions. – BillJ Aug 31 '16 at 16:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.