6

Which word fits more sound or noise in this sentence?

Suddenly, I heard an explosion sound/noise.

  • 9
    or "I heard the sound of an explosion". – AndyT Oct 3 '16 at 11:49
  • If you really want to use this structure, "I heard an exploding noise/sound" sounds more natural than "I heard an explosion noise/sound." – barbecue Oct 4 '16 at 17:16
40

My suggestion: Neither. The phrase

'Suddenly, I heard an explosion'

is enough, there is no need to identify the actual sound separately, it's already indicated by 'explosion'.

  • 5
    Boom is an onomatopeic word for explosions that can be used too. "Suddenly, there was a boom!" – LawrenceC Oct 3 '16 at 10:35
  • 6
    You can lose "suddenly", too. Explosions are sudden by definition: you can't hear an explosion gradually. – David Richerby Oct 3 '16 at 21:57
  • 7
    @DavidRicherby I'm all for being concise, but I think "suddenly" is valid in this case. The word implies the explosion is both quick and unexpected. – Tonkleton Oct 4 '16 at 0:42
7

Without the context of knowing that it actually is an explosion, I would suggest

Suddenly, I heard what sounded like an explosion.

although other answers may be more appropriate if you can identify the explosion from more than the sound alone.

4

Explosion sound and explosion noise both sound wrong to my native-speaker ear. I would only ever say "I heard an explosion" or "I heard the [sound/noise] of an explosion".

I can't quite figure out why this sounds wrong, though. You certainly can use "sound" as part of a compound noun, for instance "flute sound" would be perfectly fine ("flute music" would be more usual, but only because musical instruments are very strongly associated with, er, music). It might be because explosion is an event rather than an object ("crash sound" also sounds wrong).

  • It sounds wrong only through disuse. It is grammatical but not euphonic. Like "white and black" instead of "black and white". – Kaz Oct 4 '16 at 16:40
2

As an alternative as @MeanGreen's answer, I'd say:

Suddenly, I heard the sound of an explosion.

This ^ is the best alt in my opinion.

0

I'd agree with the above suggestion of, "suddenly, I heard an explosion".

As I have a degree in sound, I thought it would be worth mentioning that, in acoustics, there is a difference between sound and noise. Noise is an undesired sound or signal, for example electronic interference. In the context of the environment that this explosion occurred, it might be considered a noise, as it probably wasn't a desired sound in that setting.

https://www.britannica.com/science/noise-acoustics

0

If you're set on including "sound" or "noise" in the sentence, the adjective form of "explosion" can be used to describe the sound as "explosive".

Heard an explosive sound

Heard an explosive noise

The phrase "heard an explosion" is likely better, though, as noted in other answers.

N.b. "explosive sound" may be slight agrammatical for what you're trying to convey. An "explosive sound" would be a a loud and violent sound, but the source of the sound is left unstated. An "explosion sound" or "explosion's sound" would be the sound resulting from an explosion, even if that sound is quiet or otherwise non-explosive.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.