The question I earlier asked created further confusion for me. Some suggested using neither sound nor noise in that sentence, but what if I were to say this,

I lived in the war-torn country, Syria, where the constant (sounds/noises) of explosions and gunshots were a norm.

  • 1
    There are many nouns that could be used in place of sound or noise, e.g.: din, roar, tumult, barrage... (Note that the singular is idiomatic here: where the constant noise of explosions and gunshots was the norm.) Unfortunately, this appears to be a proofreading/editorial question. Commented Oct 3, 2016 at 20:32

1 Answer 1


"Sound" is probably better, but since you want to convey an image there are other more evocative nouns you might try, for example, "the constant thunder of explosions and rattle of gunfire," among many other options. Which you choose is all a question of personal style and intended effect.

If you do go with sound it is "sound" not "sounds", "The sound of children playing was interrupted by the roar of a passing train." I don't know if there is a rule that governs this usage, though, or if it's yet another idiom you have to memorize.

Lastly, the idiom is "the norm", not "a norm". It's short perhaps for "the normal way of things", but I can't find anything on its etymology.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .