This machine is inefficiency.

This machine is low efficiency.

Which one is correct, or what is the difference between them?


You should use:

This machine is inefficient.


This machine has a low efficiency.

Keep in mind that efficient is an adjective, and efficiency is a noun.

| improve this answer | |

Both are wrong. Correct is:

"This machine is inefficient".
"This machine is low efficient". Or: "This machine's efficiency is low"

"Inefficient" is worse than "low efficient".
If a machine is low efficient, it's efficient enough to have a benefit - even if it is not much.
If a machine is inefficient, it means that the costs are higher than the earnings.

Ok, "to be low efficient" may be strange, but in my defense, when you have to deal mainly with scientific and engineering stuff, it seems to be acceptable - where I must admit that my references are mainly Asian authors:
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Example 5
Example 6

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    Do you have an example of "low efficient" being used by a native English speaker? Efficient is an adjective, so "highly efficient" seems ok, but "low efficient" does not. The NGram doesn't appear to support "low efficient" as better than "low efficiency". books.google.com/ngrams/… – ColleenV Oct 5 '16 at 10:38
  • "The efficiency of this machine is low." would also work, wouldn't it? – miltonaut Oct 5 '16 at 11:13
  • 3
    "The machine is low efficient" doesn't sound correct. – J. Siebeneichler Oct 5 '16 at 11:15
  • 1
    "low efficient" sounds extremely unnatural to this US English speaker. – stangdon Oct 5 '16 at 14:21
  • 3
    If you are seeing a phrase like this in a technical articles with authors from non-English speaking countries, it's a hint that it may be a common mistake based on some characteristic of the author's first language. That's when it's good to know a little bit about English grammar, so you can tell what might just be technical jargon and what might be a mistake. Low is an adjective, but we expect an adverb to modify an adjective, not another adjective. That makes "low efficient" seem like it might be a mistake. – ColleenV Oct 6 '16 at 23:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.