0

In doing so, Mawdudi is not attemping to incorporate the liberal values of Western democracy.

Why did the author not use a definite article before Western? Should it not be used though? Since it refers to a specific democracy type, I think it should.

  • The primary business of Space X is space flight. That refers to a specific flight type, but nobody would ever include a definite article there. – FumbleFingers Oct 14 '16 at 13:31
  • This whole topic is confusing me. Could you elaborate more? – user43183 Oct 14 '16 at 13:49
  • Would you expect a definite article before spicy in spicy food? It refers to a specific food type, right? How about in tall trees? That's a specific type of tree, right? To your ear, what's the difference between those examples and Western in Western democracy? – Dan Bron Oct 14 '16 at 13:52
  • @user43183: It's a bit complicated (but you might find When to use articles before adjectives in a sentence? helpful). Note that although nobody would include the in your exact example, at least some of these written examples are idiomatically fine (though usually they'd still be fine without it). I think it's much more likely to be okay to include the article when contrasting Western democracy against some other kind of democracy, but I'm not sure of that. – FumbleFingers Oct 14 '16 at 14:02
  • 1
    Yes, Western democracy is a specific type of democracy, but there is only one of it in this context. There is no need to use the when there is only one of something. If you wanted to compare the different types of democracy in different western countries, a definite article would be appropriate: "the Western democracy in France is different to the Western democracy in Finland". – JavaLatte Oct 14 '16 at 16:00
4

Firstly, democracy in this context is basically a mass noun. We don't normally use articles when discussing general concepts like democracy, love, peace, etc.

Western in this case is simply an adjective, and as such doesn't cause the noun democracy to take an article, because "Western democracy" is still a general concept. You would only use the if you were picking it out as a specific case from other cases. For example, compare "I like sand" (no article, because it's a mass noun) and "I like red sand" (still no article, because it's still a mass noun) and "I like the red sand" (implies that there are other kinds of sand, but you like this specific red sand that we're talking about right now).

1

Another way to phrase your question is "why is the 'Western' in 'Western democracy' a determiner, when the 'English' in 'the English language' is a qualifier. 

"Western" and "English" do have a lot in common.  They are both proper adjectives.  They are both political designations.  There doesn't seem to be any reason for English grammar to treat these words differently. 

As it happens, English grammar treats them the same.  For example, "English grammar" and "the English language" are different, not because "English" is different than "English" but because "grammar" is different than "language". 

Many nouns, including "democracy", "grammar" and "language", have both a count and a non-count sense. 

When "democracy" is used in its countable sense, it means something like a specific government with a democratic structure.  When it's used in it's uncountable sense, it means something like a general collection of guiding principles or a style of governance. 

Your model sentence doesn't reference a countable democracy.  It remains a general idea, even though it is a specific type of that general idea. 

We can easily imagine a similar sentence that does refer to the countable sense of "democracy".  When we do, we realize that there are several Western democracies -- several governments using that style of politics. 

. . . the liberal values of Western democracies 
. . . the liberal values of a Western democracy 

In using the countable sense, we need to reference either a plural collection of government or an indefinite, singular, and possibly hypothetical government.

 

The "Western" in "Western democracy" isn't a determiner.  It is merely a qualifier.  However, the "democracy" in "Western democracy" is uncountable.  The model sentence uses the uncountable sense of the word, even though a countable sense is available.

0

It does not refer to a certain country, it's the synonym of liberal democracy. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_democracy)

  • Sorry but you didn't answer my question. – user43183 Oct 14 '16 at 13:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.