I have a question about the correctness of the phrase "put on" in this New York Times article:

“We’re going to put on term limits, which a lot of people aren’t happy about, but we’re putting on term limits,” Mr. Trump said in an interview with “60 Minutes” that aired Sunday. “We’re doing a lot of things to clean up the system.”

"Put on term limits" probably means to have term limits in place. But, I cannot find a definition of "put on" that would fit this usage. Could it be a error in the article?

  • When people speak, they don't consult a dictionary first. However, this is an unremarkable use of the verb put, and since it comprises only a single syllable, it is prominent in this particular speaker's lexicon. – P. E. Dant Reinstate Monica Nov 16 '16 at 21:28
  • @P.E.Dant - yes, the scare use of a dictionary appears to be a widespread problem. – user5267 Nov 16 '16 at 21:33
  • @AbsoluteBeginner Is there something frightening about the dictionary? I am baffled by your comment, but intrigued. – P. E. Dant Reinstate Monica Nov 16 '16 at 21:35

To put on here means :

  • to impose as a burden or levy: to put a tax on cars.

(Collins Dictionary)

  • Trump is saying that they will impose term limits.
| improve this answer | |
  • Another plausible meaning is putting term limits on an agenda (yet not necessarily passing that agenda – merely putting it up for a vote). – J.R. Nov 16 '16 at 22:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.