0

I want to say that railways is most commonly used form of transport in the country. Am I using the word "ubiquitous" correctly to convey the meaning?

City X is not accessible directly by rail (which is ubiquitous in the country / most commonly used mode of long distance transport in the country) and is known for its extreme climate.

  • 1
    Literally, ubiquitous means everywhere. So if some city is not accessible directly by rail, saying that rail is ubiquitous is a contradiction. – Peter Shor Nov 29 '16 at 11:34
  • Nonsense, @PeterShor. Everywhere is one of the meanings of ubiquitous, but not the only one. – Colin Fine Nov 29 '16 at 12:58
  • @Colin: that's why I said "literally". It comes from the Latin word ubique, meaning everywhere. And the meaning widespread is a metaphorical extension of the meaning everywhere. (Similarly, everywhere can also mean widespread.) – Peter Shor Nov 29 '16 at 13:18
  • And I would say that that is an example of the Etymological fallacy, @PeterShor. What a word comes from tells you nothing reliable about its meaning. – Colin Fine Nov 29 '16 at 15:53
3

Ubiquitous simply means “common”, not necessarily “most common”.

Therefore, if you want to convey that people won’t have any trouble finding a train to catch, than ubiquitous would work just fine.

On the other hand, if you want to say that people travel by train more than by any other transport, then you should use most common.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.