1

Here a user TRomano gave me advice to ask this question that I don't understand.

I can come back later, off to work now. But why not ask a separate question about "shall have had to" and "should have had to" and I'm sure others will answer.

What do "Shall have had to" and "Should have had to" mean?

  • We should have had to work diligently.
  • We shall have had to work diligently.
| improve this question | | | | |
  • @mike You gotta be kidding? – SovereignSun Dec 1 '16 at 13:31
  • apologies - I misread the question as being a duplicate. – mike Dec 1 '16 at 13:34
1

Since no answers have been forthcoming, perhaps these examples will show you the meaning.

I decided not to compete for a place on England's Olympic swimming team. Had I done so, I should have had to work diligently on my freestyle stroke.

If we manage to win this contract, we shall have had to work very diligently to convince the customer of the merits of our product.

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • So the first is like: If i were to compete i would need to work diligently. And second is the same but in the Present tense. – SovereignSun Dec 2 '16 at 15:34
  • The first is "if I had decided to compete". It refers to an action in the past that did not take place. So, if I were to have competed.... And the second is forward-looking (if we manage to win), and projects the point of view into the future looking back upon the hard work that will have been necessary. – Tᴚoɯɐuo Dec 2 '16 at 20:16
  • Okay, now I guess i understand, i think I do. – SovereignSun Dec 2 '16 at 20:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.