4

This question already has an answer here:

A bear goes over the river.

I can see a bear go over the river.

Are the sentences above correct? If the sentence has "can", goes will become to go?

enter image description here

marked as duplicate by Damkerng T., JavaLatte, Nathan Tuggy, Glorfindel, shin Dec 5 '16 at 9:55

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 2
    It doesn't depend on can, it depends on see. – Glorfindel Dec 5 '16 at 6:32
  • Can explain why "see" make the changes? and what other word will change goes to go? – JJ12345 Dec 5 '16 at 6:38
  • Over sound odd to me as to a non-native speaker. Should not it be across? – SovereignSun Dec 5 '16 at 7:19
  • 1
    @SovereignSun over suggests that the bear crosses the river without touching the water, as you can see in the illustration. Across would suggest that the bear traversed the river by swimming. – D. Nelson Dec 5 '16 at 7:37
  • 1
    @SovereignSun the tree log lies over the river, the bear walks/goes over the river, (without getting wet) across could imply that the bear was in the river and walked from one side of the river to the other. – Mari-Lou A Dec 5 '16 at 9:42
6

As Glorfindel noted, this is due to see, not because of can. This is a common construction in English. Other verbs that have the same effect include observe, watch, hear, feel.

There's a good explanation here: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/verb-patterns/hear-see-etc-object-infinitive-or-ing

  • How about citing something from the webpage? Links can change, rot or become broken over time... – Mari-Lou A Dec 5 '16 at 9:37

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.