I'm currently trying to describe a few species traits and group them. Here I found that I'm at a loss of correct words for the groupings. After searching a bit I found a good fitting with "beneficial traits" for traits that are enhancing specific races like extra sharp teeth, or the ability to fly.

But on the "other" side I have found no wordings that sounded fitting for negative species traits like a vulnerability to cold (as many snakes have).

So my question here is is there any such word for negative species traits?

  • We don't use race and racial of any animal except humans. Dec 27 '16 at 22:42
  • @StoneyB tnx edited it. In my case racial would have been fitting as the text I'm writing is about different races in a RPG, but as that is not really of any importance to the question per se, I've changed it and replaced racial,... with species.
    – Thomas
    Dec 27 '16 at 22:45
  • 1
    @Sto We do, though your point is well-taken. :-) Aside from uses like the game mentioned: BIOLOGY a population within a species that is distinct in some way, especially a subspecies. "people have killed so many tigers that two races are probably extinct". Google define Dec 28 '16 at 16:55

Geneticists, physical anthropologists, and other biologists, etc., use maladaptive to describe such traits.

A maladaptive trait is a common expression.



The decriptor you might be looking for is


genetic vulnerability
inherent vulnerability

meaning a vulnerability which is passed down from one generation to another and "built-in".

Sickle cell anemia is considered a genetic vulnerability outside of malaria regions.
Chinese women are less genetically vulnerable to breast cancer.

Usually additional context is needed to link the defect or vulnerability to a particular race.

Snakes are susceptible to cold weather because they are genetically cold blooded.

Lower levels of skin cancer is a genetic trait among Blacks and people with darker skin color.

  • Could one of these be used in combination with the word "trait"? (Would be prefered but as I overlooked to mention that in the question itself this answer is good even so....I won't edit my question as that would be unfair now).
    – Thomas
    Dec 27 '16 at 22:54
  • Yes, a trait is passed down through genes, additonal example in question.
    – Peter
    Dec 27 '16 at 22:58
  • A "defect", particularly a "genetic defect" is usually an abnormality, though. I think Thomas is asking more about "normal, but detrimental" genetic traits. For example, sickle-cell anemia is more common among people with African descent, a consequence of genetic traits that increase resistance to malaria.
    – Andrew
    Dec 27 '16 at 23:38
  • @Andrew I was thinking in terms of defects then being passed down, but you are correct that a defect originally is an abnormality. For example, people with near-sightedness generally have near-sighted offspring, but the acquisition of near-sightedness occurs within a single generation (when the defect occurs). Congenital blindness is a defect but does not necessarily get passed down.
    – Peter
    Dec 28 '16 at 0:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.