0

I wrote:

For example, if an orator pauses for seconds during a speech, two speculations are commonly made.

Someone suggested pauses for a few seconds. Is my own phrase incorrect? Should I specify the seconds. If no, how many seconds does my phrase, pauses for seconds, mean?

1
  • It is fine and grammatical, but not as clear as it might be. You haven't provided the necessary context, but I suppose you mean something like ...pauses for more than a few seconds...
    – TimR
    Jan 6, 2017 at 23:15

2 Answers 2

1

Their suggestion sounds more natural. It makes more clear the length of the pause, in this case "a few seconds", which means a brief pause. If you say "pauses for seconds", I'm generally going to assume the pause is between 0 and 59 seconds, because if it was more than 60 seconds, I would think you would say "minutes" instead.

But you can see that 0-59 seconds is a very large range. A two second pause in a speech would pass without notice. A 59 second pause would disturb the audience. Saying "a few" seconds, generally means 2 or more, but there is no "definition" of the maximum "a few" means. Five is probably a save bet.

I don't know that "pauses for seconds" is wrong, but I never people say "for seconds" without including a measurement, e.g. "for 10 seconds". However people do say, "I could sleep for hours", so linguistically the pattern is probably correct, but "a few seconds" sounds better as it is more specific.

0
0

"Pauses for seconds," as you've used it, sounds extremely unnatural to me as a native speaker, to the point of not being able to understand it right away. I might have used the phrase for "seconds"=second helping at a meal. One tip if you're ever unsure of a phrase, google it in quotes. "Pauses for a few seconds" has almost six times as many results as "Pauses for seconds," so you know it's the correct version.

As for how many seconds, I don't think I've ever heard it but it sounds to me like more seconds than "a few."

However, pausing for a few seconds wouldn't be cause for "speculation." Perhaps (based on the context) what you really mean is "pauses for several seconds," "pauses for more than one second", etc. Also, the second part of your sentence ("two speculations are commonly made") also sounds unnatural to me. "Speculation" is better used as an indefinite, uncountable noun, e.g. "The office was filled with speculation and innuendo, but no one knew what had actually happened." It's hard to rewrite without more context, but I might have written something more like, "viewers might speculate that one of the following is the case".

Source: native GA speaker

1
  • I hadn't thought about that. Technically "when a speaker pauses for seconds" would work perfectly well to describe someone interrupting a speech to go get a second helping of food.
    – mstorkson
    Jan 6, 2017 at 22:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .