2

I thought this was a common phrase, but it has 0 Google results.

Example sentence:

He was wrong about calling her mentally sick. However, he hadn't missed the target by too far.

If the phrase isn't grammatical/idiomatic, what's a better option?

1
  • 1
    The reason you didn't get any results is partly because to hit/miss a target is usually a "binary outcome" situation (you either hit the target or you don't). It's meaningful to say you didn't miss a target by far (you definitely missed it, but not by much), but if you didn't miss it by too far that tends to imply you were close enough (i.e. - you did in fact "succeed" - it's just that the target was imprecisely defined). The problem (such as it is) is in the semantics, not the syntax. – FumbleFingers Jan 19 '17 at 15:02
2

Your phrase is grammatical (I might say didn't miss the target by too much), and I imagine that most people would understand its meaning, however I'm not so sure about idiomatic - at the very least, other idioms would be more commonly used.

A very similar idiom that's often used in English is not (so/too) far off the mark - in other words, not far away from the target. For example.

He was wrong about calling her mentally ill. However, He wasn't too far off the mark.

(as a side note, we tend to refer to people as being '*mentally ill', rather than 'mentally sick')

A variant of this is wide of the mark, e.g.

He was wrong about calling her mentally ill. However, He wasn't too wide of the mark.

1

a more common alternative (according too google):

"...,he wasn't totally wrong".

So, to avoid the repetition, but keep the antithesis, the sentence could become like:

"He wasn't right about calling her mentally sick. Although, he wasn't totally wrong"

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.