Can I use the 2nd sentence instead of the first one:

  1. I was swayed by her rhetoric into donating all my savings to the charity.

  2. I was swayed by her rhetoric to donate all my saving to the charity

  • It's an interesting question, but I'm actually not sure it has anything to do with the word "sway". I would use into pretty much regardless of what verb was there: I was talked into donating, I was pressured into donating, I was tricked into donating, etc. – stangdon Jan 19 '17 at 20:22

Her speech failed to sway her colleagues into supporting the plan (Cambridge).

I think I can sway her to join our side (The Free Dictionary).

In light of these sentences, I think you can use either the construction sway + somebody + into + an -ing form" or the construction "sway + somebody + a to-nfinitive".

Furthermore, it's more appropriate and common to say savings instead of saving and charity instead of the charity in the sentence presented.


Both seem ok, but I prefer "to donate" over "into donating". If I recall both the infinitive form (to X) and the gerund form (X-ing) act as the same part of speech here, so it's more a question of personal taste and style than grammar.

It also varies depending on which verb or idiomatic expression is used. For example:

She convinced me to bake her a cake.

She talked me into baking her a cake.

"Swayed by her rhetoric" is an unusual enough phrase that there doesn't seem to be a preference one way or the other. But as written, it's an awkward sentence, which I would rewrite as a compound sentence:

I was swayed by her rhetoric, so much so that I donated all my savings to the charity.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.