There is the following sentence:

"Should this bar deplete your weapons will automatically shut off..." (c)

What can I see here is that the sentence starts with question form and continues like conditional (frankly speaking I don't know how to call it correctly). I have never faced such a construction before and therefore I really eager to understand it in more details.

I would be really grateful to you if you at least can give me the right direction to google!


You understand this correctly as a conditional. Subject-auxiliary inversion is an alternative to if for expressing the condition clause in a conditional construction:

If this bar should deplete... → Should this bar deplete...
If I were to go... → Were I to go...
If I had gone ... → Had I gone...

At one time this construction was fairly common with all past-form auxiliaries, and those uses may still be encountered in some literary contexts

Could I but see my native land again I would die happy.

But in present-day English it is usually found only with were, had and should; and even with those three it has an old-fashioned ring. As a learner you need to understand this construction, but it's not a very useful addition to your English toolkit, except possibly as a verbal trick to impress examiners.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.