We all know that simple present tense is used to show habitual action.
I play tennis. (current habitual action)
She does not play tennis. (current habitual action)
She always forgets her purse. (current habitual action)
My question is that:
Is the structure "should do something" JUST advice form of "simple present tense"?
I should play tennis. (it is advice that "playing tennis" should be my current habitual action, ie, I should play tennis as a habit)
She should not play tennis. (it is advice that "not playing tennis" should be her current habitual action, ie, she should never play tennis)
She should not forget her purse. (it is advice that "not forgetting her purse" should be her current habitual action, ie she should never forget her purse)
All the above advice is general. However, we got specific advice as well.
Ex: Mary should inform me after Tom calls her tomorrow at 3 pm.
But we normally don't use simple present tense for specific action. We either use simple past or simple future for it.
So, we don't say: Mary informs me after Tom calls her tomorrow at 3 pm.
But we say: Mary will inform me after Tom calls her tomorrow at 3 pm.
So, the belief that the structure "should do something" is JUST advice form of "simple present tense" is simply wrong?