I have two sentences and would like to combine them using a relative clause.

  1. Those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat previous mistakes.

  2. Knowing previous mistakes helps us to avoid repeating those mistakes.

Can I say:

Those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat previous mistakes, knowing which helps us to avoid repeating those mistakes.

And is there some guide that I can read in regards to this topic?

  • I can't help noticing some sort of wordiness. I wouldn't go far after the first sentence because the idea is quite clear. You could finish your sentence and start a new one with a new subject and verb probably trying to capture a different aspect of the theme. Also if you'd like to continue, there is a shift in viewpoint that I don't find very attractive i.e. Those and suddenly us. – Yuri Feb 27 '17 at 8:35
  • Thank you so much for the suggestions! But I still want to know, grammatically, if using a participle in front of a relative pronoun is acceptable. ("Knowing + which" as the subject of the clause?) – Sen Foo Feb 27 '17 at 9:22
  • I see no problem with that grammatically ...repeat previous mistakes, learning lessons from which helps avoid making them in future that would be the least alteration of your original sentence though I believe you need to reconsider it. Also the participle might be considered by some as a dangling structure since there is not a word that we can refer to as the agent of the participle. – Yuri Feb 27 '17 at 11:00

You're very close to correct, but I would say there are two issues.

Firstly, consider whether learning is supposed to be a participial adjective or a gerund. In the original sentence, it's a gerund, because it means the act of knowing helps us.

But when you stick that sentence on another sentence, it looks like a participial adjective, but then it doesn't make sense. The participial clause usually applies to the subject of the sentence. Consider "the birds flew by the window, chirping loudly" - clearly, the birds were chirping loudly, not the window. Likewise, the subject of the first sentence is those who don't learn from the past, so if you just stick on a participial clause, it sounds like it applies to those who don't learn, which is not what you want.

Secondly, if you want to make a dependent clause, it should begin with a subordinate conjunction like which, so you were almost correct, but it should be "...previous mistakes, which knowing helps us..."

If you want to make a completely separate independent clause (effectively a separate sentence), it needs a coordinating conjunction like and or but or a semicolon. For example:

"They are doomed to repeat previous mistakes, but knowing previous mistakes helps us..."
"They are doomed to repeat previous mistakes; knowing previous mistakes helps us..."

- Clauses and phrases
- Subordinate conjunctions


stangdon is right in his first point and wrong in his second. You CAN say "knowing which," although your particular sentence is quite clunky.

  • Hm, you might be right about that, now that I think about it. (BTW, this should probably be a comment on my answer, rather than a separate answer.) – stangdon Feb 28 '17 at 23:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.