1

As in the title, which of the two is better:

  1. During the last economic crisis, many families lived from hand to mouth.
  2. During the last economic crisis, many families were living from hand to mouth.
5
  • Did you try looking up the definition of 'living' or 'loving'? The difference is obvious once you have. The expression 'hand to mouth' means that there is no extra (food), everything found or received is immediately used. Oh! Was 'loving' a typo?
    – WRX
    Mar 28, 2017 at 19:13
  • Yes it was a typo sorry i meant 'living'.
    – Hvjj
    Mar 28, 2017 at 19:17
  • Is this for fiction or nonfiction? A research paper may have different criteria. I think both sound fine -- but I am not one of the experts.
    – WRX
    Mar 28, 2017 at 19:32
  • Nonfiction but not academic either, i'm just asking because i wasn't sure as both sound fine to me as well but as the last financial crisis took place around a certain period of time I started leaning more towards the second option
    – Hvjj
    Mar 28, 2017 at 19:35
  • Well I lean towards #2 as well, but I have no reason for it.
    – WRX
    Mar 28, 2017 at 19:37

1 Answer 1

2

English style guides recommend not using the continuous tense unless it's integral to the meaning of the sentence. This is because certain words in a sentence can detract from the readers sense that the writer is certain about the subject -- every little word introduces some measure of doubt. Someone who is sure of themselves uses short, declarative sentences. Compare these:

She eats muesli for breakfast every morning.
She is eating muesli for breakfast every morning.

The first is clear, simple, and certain. The second introduces a slight uncertainty, as if the author is not sure if her breakfast is the same every morning.

That being said, these style guides are for formal, expository writing. With creative writing you say whatever sounds best to you. Also, as you get more comfortable with expository writing, you define your own style.

In your example there is actually a slight difference in nuance between the simple past and the simple past continuous tense. The first says "this happened". The second says "this was happening (while something else was going on)".

If you plan to talk about some other contemporaneous event -- which is strongly implied by your use of "during" -- then the continuous tense is appropriate. Otherwise, your default should be the simple past.

While he is watching the pitcher, a good baseball player will also note the movements of every other player on the field.

1
  • Thank you! "The second says "this was happening (while something else was going on)"." This really helped me. I hope it helps the OP.
    – WRX
    Mar 28, 2017 at 20:35

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .