Actually I have this question for long time. As I started to use contracted words like I've , it's, you're (verb with subject), and due to habit of shorting verb+not like haven't, isn't etc, eventually I came to write words that are contracted twice e.g I'ven't, it'sn't, you'ren't etc.

But I suspect about correctness of it since that I've never found such twice contraction in a sentence. So, finally I has come to ask: Is it ok to contract and combine more than one words simultaneously?

I mean combining effects of I've + not & I + haven't to I'ven't! and similar possible word contractions.

  • Set the way-back machine to question number 50 on ELU: english.stackexchange.com/questions/50/… – Davo May 30 '17 at 18:05
  • Generally, it's best not to make any more contractions. There are a certain number of accepted contractions in English, and that group nearly never grows outside of local dialects. – Stephen S May 30 '17 at 18:18
  • No, no and no. There are no double contractions. They are two choices sometimes, however: He isn't rich or He's not rich. Your examples are not correct. I've not seen him today (usually British); I haven't see him today (usually American). Just two examples. – Lambie May 30 '17 at 19:30

Contraction of VERB+not (isn't, haven't, &c) occurs only when the verb is stressed; but contraction of NOUN+VERB or PRONOUN+VERB (Jack's, she'd, I've, &c) occurs only when the verb is unstressed.

A verb can't be stressed and unstressed at the same time; so these “double” contractions are not valid English.

  • 1
    You've not pointed out that idiomatically, most people today would normally contract that one as You haven't [pointed it out]. – FumbleFingers May 30 '17 at 17:54
  • 1
    @FumbleFingers I was trying to avoid opening that can of worms. – StoneyB on hiatus May 30 '17 at 17:56
  • 1
    I hadn't seen this earlier question when I posted that comment, but it might be worth you including a link to it. Though as implied above, I personally don't endorse the accepted answer there, which starts with They are equal. Neither is preferable. – FumbleFingers May 30 '17 at 18:04
  • 2
    @FumbleFingers And the accepted answer proposes I'ven't. rrr... – StoneyB on hiatus May 30 '17 at 18:14

No. There are specific words like 'not' or verbs 'is and 'have' come to mind, that contracted with a pronoun are fine in English usage. Your use of I'ven't isnt a word and isnt easily even interpreted meaningfully. It looks like 'I vent', with entirely different meaning.

Your combination of I have not must be I haven't. Anything other than that would not be standard English usage. Hope that helps you.

  • "Isnt" isn't a correct form. – user178049 May 30 '17 at 18:02
  • What is your point, oh anonymous grammar god? – Amanda_M May 31 '17 at 18:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.