I knew this game. Lundist held that a man who can observe is a man apart. Such a man can see opportunities where others see only the obstacles on the surface of each situation.

This is a quotation from Prince of Thorns, chapter 11.
How does this sentence work?
Is "he held that a man" equal to "he is a man"?
I've googled that "a man apart" = "standing apart because he has different traits" but I can't make any sense of the sentence. Why is there "is a man apart"? What kind of grammar is it?


Held is the past participle of "hold." "Hold" here means "to believe or have a particular opinion about something." Here, it has been used with a clause following it. "a man who can observe" is the subject of the sentence "a man who can observe is a man apart." I speculate "a man apart" is also the reduced form of "a man who is apart."

| improve this answer | |
  • I take "a man apart" to mean "a man who is special". I suppose by "a man who can observe" he means someone like Sherlock Holmes, someone who is able to make very careful observations, which is not a skill everyone has. – James K Jun 3 '17 at 15:42
  • @Ilya For more on the meaning of a man apart, see: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/30331/… – Ronald Sole Jun 3 '17 at 15:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.