2

I am learning how to write complex sentences. (I am writing an email to a friend who can not stop laughing for some reason)

There are no reasons for you to keep laughing or to suspect that I did that funny things on purpose.

Shall I omit the second preposition, to in the above sentence?
If yes, what is this kind of grammar called?

  • 2
    Either one is fine. Repeating "to" is a little more "correct"/formal, hence less suitable for an email between friends (but still wouldn't be a problem anyway). P.S. I'd say "There's no reason" here; "There are no reasons" sounds like you might have expected multiple reasons to be required for laughing. – Luke Sawczak Jun 16 '17 at 15:39
6

You could omit it, but I find it more natural with the second "to". I think this is because, given the complexity of the sentence it makes it clearer what the suspect pairs with.

Incidentally, you have a stray "s" on the end of "that funny thing". And idiomatically, "There is no reason" is much more natural than "There are no reasons".

1

I would leave the second to in, since the two verb forms "keep laughing" and "suspect" are different. However,

There are no reasons for you to laugh or suspect that I did that funny thing (those funny things) on purpose.

would be fine.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.