All my hope were duped and I was plunged in deep sorrow.

I have two questions regarding the above sentence.

First : Hope is a uncountable noun so is using were correct with it or it should be was instead of were ?

Second : Which is the correct construction between All my hope and My all hope. I think former one is a correct / better construction, Am I right ?

| improve this question | | | | |
  • 2
    All my hope is correct but requires singular was; all my hopes were would be fine, too. It's difficult to conceive how hope may be duped; perhaps you mean dashed or betrayed or something of that sort. – StoneyB on hiatus Jun 22 '17 at 17:21
  • @StoneyB You are saying that 'All my hopes were' is too fine so does that mean hope can be used as a countable noun too ? – user212388 Jun 22 '17 at 17:36
  • 1
    Yes. You may have non-count hope, a general state of anticipating a happy future, or you may have one or more individual hopes for specific future eventualities. – StoneyB on hiatus Jun 22 '17 at 17:39
  • 1
    Hopes are usually dashed, not duped (i.e., fooled or duplicated). – Robusto Jun 22 '17 at 18:40
  • "plunged in deep sorrow" might be better as "plunged into deep sorrow" because you are moving in to "deep sorrow" – Mobeer Jun 27 '17 at 21:59

An idiomatic construction would be to make hope plural and to use dashed rather than duped as to be duped means to be tricked or fooled.

All my hopes were dashed and I was plunged into deep sorrow.

My all hope is incorrect.

| improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.