I encountered this sentence in a scientific article.

During XYZ activity occurs a reduction in A

I take this to mean 'A gets reduced during XYZ activity'. My question is, should we rephrase this sentence to 'During XYZ activity there occurs a reduction in A'? Also if the original sentence is acceptable, should there be a comma after 'occurs'?

I tried Google search (see 1, 2). But I could not find any similar sentences in the few results. I was not sure how to do further research on this.

  • If the way I'm reading the sentence is correct then the better way to say it would be: "During XYZ activity, A is reduced" or "During XYZ activity, the level of A is reduced" depending on what exactly A is. Jul 6, 2017 at 15:53

1 Answer 1


This is one of those times when the precise "correct" phrasing is a bit debatable, but the initial sentence is not incorrect.

Conversationally, native speakers might insert words like you've suggested (for example, "there occurs a reduction" or "there is a reduction"). But in formal writing, we try to strip out superfluous words. So the author (or an editor) has done that here. But given that "occurs a reduction" is a bit stuffy-sounding even with the extra, more colloquial words in there, the edit to remove superfluous words has given us a sentence that almost sounds too formal.

We could rephrase the sentence many ways to make it still sound formal but not quite so weird. Just a few examples:

  • During XYZ activity, A is reduced.
  • During XYZ activity, (a) reduction in A occurs.
  • During XYZ activity, (a) reduction occurs in A.

You'll see I included a comma after "activity" in each of these, which I think helps break things up. That works for each of these examples because what comes after the comma can stand as a sentence on its own in each case. (I.e., the part before the comma is a dependent clause, and the part after the comma is an independent clause.)

However, in the original sentence, "occurs a reduction in A" can't stand alone as a sentence, so we'd leave out the comma to clearly indicate that "occurs" is paired with "during XYZ activity."

Note, though, that the use of commas after introductory (dependent) clauses is at least somewhat a matter of style. Different style guides sometimes specify that an introductory clause does not necessarily need a comma after it, if the clause is short and the overall sentence makes sense without it. But my instinct is that omitting the comma in each of my examples would make the sentence hard to read.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .