In this example:

"Being students, they didn't have much money and they worked as waiters at weekends"

We can use in this example only "didn't have" because in this case it means "Possession", right? Also we can use "worked" or "were working" and it means same things,Am I right?


I don't quite understand the first question. "Didn't have" is the simple past of "don't have", the negative of "have", in those varieties of English that use do-support with "have" - most varieties today. In British English you will also hear "hadn't got" and occasionally just "hadn't".

You can use "worked" or "were working", but they don't mean quite the same thing. They don't express a difference in the objective facts, just in how the speaker is choosing to regard them. If you say "they were working", it either emphasises the continuing behaviour, spread over weeks or months, or else is setting this habitual activity as a background in the narrative that follows.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.