-3

I have written the following snippet:

But you said you don't believe in god.... No I said I don't believe that he can see people go through agony....The fact that someone has to eat someone else to survive....The fact that someone has to go through pain before dying...or the fact that someone has to go through pain at all....the fact that he designed a world where there would be deceit and anguish...I dont believe that a world like that could have been designed by god.....

But I am not liking the usage of the word 'eat'. I want to use some better word that would replace 'eat'.'Consume' could have been used. But I don't like that usage either.

When I searched through the Internet, I got synonyms such as consume, devour, ingest.....I didn't like the word 'consume', because it was somewhat more formal, we generally use it in scientific textbooks.... I didn't like 'devour' because many a times we don't really relish a food but have to consume it out of our regular appetite, just because we need fodder to sustain ourselves.....We are omnivorous...but certain organisms who are carnivorous have to depend on killing other animals for food.....I didn't like the word 'ingest' because it simply refers to swallowing food.... I think 'feed on their fellow creatures' would be alright as it sounds refined ,'eat' sounds rather crude.....


EDIT:

Based on the comments and answers,I rephrased the above snippet:

But you said you don't believe in god.... No I said I don't believe that he can see people go through agony....The fact that someone has to feed on their fellow creatures to survive....The fact that someone has to go through pain before dying...or the fact that someone has to go through pain at all....the fact that he designed a world where there would be deceit and anguish...I dont believe that a world like that could have been designed by god.....

I have a problem here. As pointed out by Mr/Ms. StonyB 'someone' refers to a person. How can I make the sentence more relevant by including every living creature in place of 'someone'...

  • "Eat" would be the normal usage here, if you're referring to actual cannibalism. If you're referring to something else, please clarify your meaning. – Jeff Zeitlin Aug 1 '17 at 19:58
  • @JeffZeitlin By eat I meant eating other living beings. – Soumee Aug 1 '17 at 20:00
  • 1
    someone else would ordinarily refer to a person. You might try eat fellow creatures. – StoneyB Aug 1 '17 at 20:22
  • @StoneyB So what should be used in place of someone else to indicate other living creatures. English is not my native language hence my usage is not perfect.... – Soumee Aug 1 '17 at 20:25
  • 1
    @FilipeAndradeLopes Sir, its ok.... J.R sir might have said something at the spur of the moment..... But he also has helped in improving the question by adding the relevant comments to the question....Efforts by all of you has helped me in clearing my doubt about the question... – Soumee Aug 2 '17 at 14:37
0

You could use one of these: devour, feed on, prey on.

  • Devour gives the idea of a violent act, like a wild animal eating his prey.
  • Example: "You fear they will devour you. You fear that they are not like you, that they are wolfish." - Children of the Forest, by David B. Schock
  • Feed on gives the idea of eating but does not carry the connotation of aggressiveness.
  • Example: "To feed on fish, the snails needed toxins that instantly knocked them down..." - Natural History Magazine
  • Prey on gives the same idea of devour. Relating to animals most of the examples I found refers to the act of eating, but when talking about people it is used in a figurative way.
  • Figurative example: "Unfortunately, there are people and organizations that prey on the good intentions of individuals..." - Education & Treatment of Children (West Virginia University Press)
  • Literal example: "Indeed orcas prey on cachalot, gray, fin, humpback, and many other whales, which is why whalers called them killers of whales." - National Geographic

So your choice depends on how you want the reader to feel.

  • So I may use the phrase : "The fact that someone has to feed on their fellow creatures to survive". Now does 'someone' refer only to human beings? What if I want to extend it for all creatures? – Soumee Aug 1 '17 at 20:46
  • 1
    You have answered several questions here, and by now you must know that an answer without an explanation is not useful to the questioner. – P. E. Dant Aug 1 '17 at 22:46
  • @Soumee you could use living beings instead of human beings. – Mr. Mister Aug 2 '17 at 4:14
  • @choster, made some corrections based on your feedback – Mr. Mister Aug 2 '17 at 12:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.