1

Following is excerpted from the book "The Language of Food" by Dan Jurafsky(page 7).

Status used to be expressed a different way.

I am getting confused with this sentence.

As far as know, an object(a different way) can not follow a passive form expression(to be expressed). Meaningwise, "a different way" supposed to be "in a different way," a prepositional phrase.

So, "in" is omitted in this sentence? If so, is it because of the reason the previous post explained?(Link: Can the preposition “in” be omitted , in sentence, “you expect to rule the city the way you rule other city.”)

  • 1
    The author or editor made a mistake, and it should be "expressed in a different way". It is possible to omit the "in" as a kind of ellipsis when speaking, but it sounds wrong to me when written. – Andrew Aug 14 '17 at 17:39
1

yes, sounds like a mistake. It needs "in". Author could also have used "conveyed in" as an alternative to "expressed"

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.