1

When I want to say on my resume that I was mentioned on that list, should I say

Was mentioned on the Dean's list several times.

or

Was mentioned on Dean's list several times.

?

I think that the first is better but Grammarly (a grammar-checking application) gave an error when I wrote it:

It is unlikely that your sentence needs both the article the and the determiner Dean's. Consider deleting the article.

  • 1
    I remain skeptical of automated grammar-checkers in general, but according to their website, Grammarly is supposed to provide explanations when it flags a suspicious word or construction. Why does Grammarly prefer the second? – choster Sep 7 '17 at 15:37
  • +1. Here is what Grammarly says: "It is unlikely that your sentence needs both the article the and the determiner Dean's. Consider deleting the article." – ammar Sep 7 '17 at 16:24
  • 1
    Thanks. In that case, @DoWhileNot 's explanation seems to be correct, and I would retain the article. That said, in a U.S. context, this strikes me as unnecessarily wordy; Dean's List on its own would be self-explanatory, as in, Rice University, AB Philosophy, Cum Laude, Dean's List 5 semesters or some such. – choster Sep 7 '17 at 16:41
3

"On the Dean's list" is correct. You probably got the error from Grammarly because of the confusion between "Dean" the title and "Dean" the name.

If I was on Dean's list, then I would be on a list made by some guy named Dean.

If I was on the Dean's list, then I'd be on a list of someone who's title was, "The Dean."

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.