0

I know who this job should be entrusted to for smooth handling.

Is the who pronoun correct here ? It sounds a little weird, I think it should be replaced by to whom.

  • 1
    In traditional grammar, it should be "whom", since it is object of the preposition "to". But like it or lump it, "whom" is disappearing fast, and "who" is becoming dominant. But note that if you fronted the relative word together with the preposition to give the ridiculously formal "I know to whom this job should be entrusted for smooth handling", then "who" is not normally allowed. – BillJ Sep 11 '17 at 6:08
1

A few native speakers say that the fine line between using 'who' and 'whom' is getting vanished, however, to me it still exists.

For the given example, I'd go for 'whom.'

Ask yourself: "...this job should be entrusted to he or him?

It's 'him,' so, the choice is 'whom.'

But again, as I said, many may favor both: who/whom in the given context.

1

This sentence would work fine in off-the-cuff speech, but is a little awkward on the page because of the two prepositions coming together ("to for").

I would be likely to re-word it as:

I know who should be entrusted with this job for smooth handling

or

I know who to entrust with this job for smooth handling.

But if I wanted to retain the original wording, I would keep "who":

I know who this job should be entrusted to for smooth handling.

It is true that according to the rules of prescriptive grammar, "whom" would be more correct, but this sounds excessively formal:

I know to whom this job should be entrusted for smooth handling.

Of course, you could also re-word it as:

I know which employee this job should be entrusted to for smooth handling.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.