0

They say had is only when an action was completed (finished or "perfected") at some point in the past before something else happened.

But i recently heard a sentence from Fault in Our Stars:

Hazel says I didn't believe a word. But that's okay.

I knew this was the right thing to do. Funerals, I had decided, are not for the dead. They're for the living.

Shouldn't it be decided, not had decided as no other event is mentioned there after or before that?

migrated from english.stackexchange.com Sep 20 '17 at 16:40

This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.

  • The speaker had decided that before the other things in his story happened. So everything the speaker is telling you about what happened (I knew) happened after the I had decided. – oerkelens Sep 20 '17 at 11:03
  • Hello and welcome to EL&U. I've edited your question to make it clearer. Please feel free to edit it further or to roll back the changes. – Lawrence Sep 20 '17 at 12:02
  • Thank you @lawrence? Could you please answer it too? – user62492 Sep 20 '17 at 12:13
  • Here's a little writeup about the two sites: What is the difference between ELU and ELL? – Lawrence Sep 20 '17 at 14:12
  • I have to post the same question on ELL? – user62492 Sep 20 '17 at 14:13
2

The perfect relates a prior eventuality to one occurring at 'reference time' (RT) —the time of the situation you are talking about.

Establishing RT does not require an "event"—it may be established by a "non-event" such as remaining silent or by a state such as knowing or being.

The RT in this case is established before the past perfect is used: I didn't, I knew. In this context, I had decided indicates that the speaker reached the decision that funerals are for the living, not the dead,before RT, and that decision gave rise to his knowledge at RT that not speaking was the right thing to do.

  • now i kind of got it. But could you please provide me some more examples of this sort. So that i could understand better? – user62492 Sep 20 '17 at 12:18
  • 1
    @user62492 "I had written (pa·pf) a very short answer, so you *didn't (past) understand my original answer." RT is past, your not understanding, and my writing occurred before that and gave rise to your not understanding. – StoneyB Sep 20 '17 at 12:22
  • had occurred before that and gave rise to your not understanding* – user62492 Sep 20 '17 at 12:24
  • @user62492 Sorry - 'past perfect'. – StoneyB Sep 20 '17 at 12:40
  • DO use comments to ask for clarification, suggest changes, or offer short-lived information. DO NOT use them for minor edits (edit instead) answers (post an answer instead), praise or rebukes (vote instead), discussion (chat instead), or comments on site design or policy (post at meta instead). – MetaEd Sep 20 '17 at 15:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.