Can I say so? Is it right in terms of grammar?

it was wrong to meet him without having had talked before

I know for sure that it's correct to say:

without having talked

but I mean exactly the past perfect time

  • 3
    Having talked is the correct participial past perfect. Having had talked is not a permissible construction--the perfect auxiliary HAVE can only appear once. – StoneyB on hiatus Nov 20 '17 at 1:54

It is correct to say having talked but not having had talked. The verb constructions / participles don't fit together. After having had you would need a noun for the sentence to be correct.


  • it was wrong to meet him without having had a discussion before

"Having talked" is correct. "Having had talked" is never correct.

Just to add to the existing answer: you suggested that "having had talked" might be appropriate because you're referring to "past perfect time". So you might be thinking of "having talked" as a use of the present perfect. This would be wrong.

"Having talked" is perfect, but it's not present perfect. Participles such as "having" are non-finite and have no tense. So there is no past equivalent of "having talked" because "having talked" isn't a present tense form (or any tense at all) in the first place.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.