0

Consider this sentence:

Most historians trace the beginning of the Internet to Sputnik, the first satellite ..........

  1. orbited the earth successfully.
  2. to successfully orbit the earth.

The correct answer is 2. But why not 1? and why one should use "to" here?

  • the first satellite to orbit the Earth successfully. Also, that internet thing is wrong. It was developed by the US military. – Lambie Feb 17 '18 at 18:13
  • 1
    #1 is wrong because the first satellite orbited the earth successfully is syntactically a complete sentence - though an unlikely one, since it would require a context where first was clearly distinguished from others (such as the second and third satellites, which by implication failed to achieve orbit anyway). But in your cited context, the first satellite to successfully orbit the earth is simply an optional additional clause "defining, providing further details about" the preceding noun Sputnik. – FumbleFingers Reinstate Monica Feb 17 '18 at 19:00
  • 1
    Note that the first one to do it means the same as the first one that/which did it. – FumbleFingers Reinstate Monica Feb 17 '18 at 19:04
  • @FumbleFingers I see, you mean #1 lacks a "that/which" to be grammatical. – Ahmad Feb 17 '18 at 19:12
2

A relative clause identifies or qualifies or describes a preceding noun. It is normally introduced by a relative pronoun or relative adverb. It contains a subject and a properly inflected verb. So the proper way to use a relative clause in your example is Sputnik, the satellite that first orbited the earth. (As was pointed out in a comment, "successfully" is redundant.) The relative pronoun "that" is the subject and "orbited" is the verb.

The second option is to use an appositional phrase with a "to infinitive." Such a phrase is an abbreviated substitute for a particular form of relative clause. In your example, it is abbreviating Sputnik, which was the first satellite to orbit the earth. The subject of the clause is "which" and the verb is "was." If the subject and verb are dropped, we get an appositional phrase with the infinitive retained: Sputnik, the first satellite to orbit the earth.

  • So, the "to" is because of the "first" and the pattern is "to be the first to do something" – Ahmad Feb 17 '18 at 20:54
  • @Ahmed Yes, that is the pattern. – Jeff Morrow Feb 17 '18 at 21:00
1

The first one to do it will win a prize.

The first one to do it wins a prize.

The first one to do it won a prize.

The infinitive in general does not refer to an occurrence of the action in real time; rather it refers to the action abstractly, outside of time. You can see from the examples above that the main verb can be future or past or present. So, the infinitive clause (in bold) is subject-oriented, telling us something about the subject.

Is there a mechanic in town who can repair a 1952 Ford?
--The man to do it is Bob. He knows a lot about old cars.

We can paraphrase this clause with a relative clause:

The man who can do it is Bob.

or with a prepositional phrase:

The man for the job is Bob.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.