0

Can I say "she cannot come in person to give me a hand with producing this journal but she is willing to help remotely"?

Is this fluent English?

  • 2
    It's grammatically and idiomatically sound. I wouldn't use the term 'fluent', which means "flowing easily" and is ordinarily used of speech rather than writing, and of longer passages than this. – StoneyB Jan 18 '14 at 3:43
  • thx. So a text may be sound but it cannot be fluent./how should I say a text is not only grammatically right but nice? rhetoric? @StoneyB – Juya Jan 18 '14 at 7:16
  • @StoneyB "is ordinarily used (of) speech rather than writing" Does of here equal (for)? very interesting. Can I use of instead of for everywhere after used? – Juya Jan 18 '14 at 7:18
  • 1
    @Juya 'use of speech' and 'and of longer...' means as a part it. And, no you cannot use it every time. The tool is used for cutting the grass and not of. – Maulik V Jan 18 '14 at 7:23
  • 1
    @Juya "is used of X" is a long-established idiom, abbreviating "is used in speaking of X", where of = about, so No, the usage cannot be generalized. It's rather old-fashioned and academic, but I am elderly and I used to be an academic. :) – StoneyB Jan 18 '14 at 13:13
4

You can say:

She cannot come in person and help me make/produce this journal, but she's willing to help remotely.

That's proper English and not (preferably?) fluent as stated by StoneyB.

The adverb remotely is used to describe something from a distance.

Remotely (adv.) - from a distance

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.