I want to describe parameters which have been set experimentally to my algorithms. So, I listed out parameters in table 5 and also described important points as follows.
Table 5 summarises the fundamental parameters used by the reconstruction approach. The parameters are set by the user based on his knowledge about data and landscape. In terms of scene complexities for e.g. having closely located feature lines, scene 1 and 3 are bit complicated than scene 2. This illustrates by the narrow half-width equal to 0.7m in Table 5. On the other hand, scene1 consists of shorter edges than other two scenes, which leads to accept short ridge-lines and step-edges roughly equal to 0.5m. In the case of remaining parameters, they behave in a similar manner, thus, equally set for every scene.
So, my question is I want to know whether this description is smoothly connected to each other? that mean, I first explain similarity of site1 and 3. then how site 1 deviate from others. finally, similarity of all sites. So, please comments whether my explanation has good connection and flow.
Your suggestions and corrections are also very welcome.