What's the correct construction?

Example sentence:

A bear! Better not (to) move or it would devour her.

Should the to be there? Why or why not?

  • 1
    WHY? - because the speaker assumes his "sentence" as given is short for something like It would be better not to [do something]. WHY NOT? - because he thinks it's short for something like I/We had better not [do something]. In short, both versions are fine, and it's a matter of personal choice which to use. – FumbleFingers Reinstate Monica Mar 26 '18 at 13:51
  • @FumbleFingers Won't you turn that into an answer? – Ronald Sole Mar 26 '18 at 14:51
  • @Ronald Sole: I'm still trying to figure out exactly why it would be feasible for me to respond to your comment with Better not! if I disagreed, whereas if I did agree it would be a complete no-no to respond with Better! – FumbleFingers Reinstate Monica Mar 26 '18 at 16:18

The "better not move" sentence seems like an imperative (you are commanding the other party---after all, there's a bear). Placing the "to" after the not sounds a bit awkward to my ear but it is less imperative, like a suggestion. Perhaps "It would be better not to move..." would be a way to rephrase the sentence if the bear were far away.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.