17

From the movie Tracks:

Robyn: Would you mind not taking pictures?

Rick: A man has to do his job.

Robyn: That's exactly the reason blacks were dumped in missions... men just doing their job.

It seems coming out of nowhere. The film is set in the Australian Outback, so I am not sure what missions and what blacks she is talking about.

|improve this question
  • 4
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Generations "Official government estimates are that between one in ten and one in three indigenous Australian children were forcibly taken from their families and communities between 1910 and 1970..." – ceejayoz Apr 9 '18 at 21:53
32

Blacks in (increasingly, non-PC) Australian means [native] aborigines. Robyn is saying that the natives were dumped = (hastily / carelessly) moved / relocated to (charitable, church-sponsored) missions by (white) people who thought they were "just doing their job" (looking after and bringing civilisation to those natives).

As most people would now agree, that policy didn't work out too well. But to the average Australian today, that cynical reference to a failed historical policy doesn't exactly "come out of nowhere". For many, it's something they're very consciously aware of in any context involving aboriginals (it's not exactly the Holocaust, but as a nation, Australia isn't too comfortable with what they did).

I haven't seen the movie, but a quick glance at the subtitles implies the immediately-preceding context involves aboriginals. So the cynical reference to that particular example of the problems caused by people "just doing their jobs" would be completely natural and contextually relevant.

|improve this answer
  • 1
    I think today it is preferred to use Aboriginal Australians or Aboriginal People, and (to include Torres Strait Islanders) Indigenous Australians. – Bent Apr 10 '18 at 13:24
  • It's all a bit of a terminological / sociological minefield. For the noun usage, I only actually wrote aborigines once in my answer text. That was the word I grew up learning to use 50-60 years ago, but I sense that the "adjective used as noun" form aboriginals is somehow slightly less "tainted", so I switched to that afterwards... – FumbleFingers Apr 11 '18 at 13:45
  • ... see this NGram showing how that earlier form has declined over my lifetime. Western civilisation did pretty much trample all over the indigenous Australians (I don't think they've survived the cultural invasion as well as, say, native Hawaiians). But they gave us Geoffrey Gurrumul Yunupingu – FumbleFingers Apr 11 '18 at 13:56
  • Talking of the Holocaust, "just doing their job" seems rather reminiscent of the "Nuremberg defence" of "just following orders". – Andrew Grimm May 4 '18 at 3:06
  • @Andrew: For ethical reasons we've never meaningfully followed up on the Milgram experiment, but it's worth noting that Wikipedia says there: Milgram devised his psychological study to answer the popular contemporary question: "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Personally I think a lot of people are simply deluding themselves when they say I'd never do bad things like that. They mostly would - it's just that so far we don't really have any way of proving that. – FumbleFingers May 4 '18 at 13:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.