According to what I learnt, there are short and long adjectives.

Short adjectives: one syllable.

Long adjectives: two / three / four syllables.

All of those short adjectives (one syllable) get suffix of -er or -est in their comparative or superlative grades - correspondingly. (For example: fast, high, low, etc.)

Now my question regarding that are:

1) why is the adjective "wrong" which is one syllable doesn't get -er or -est?

Wiktionary says:

The single-word comparative and superlative forms wronger and wrongest are no longer in common use, except humorously; rather, the locutions “more wrong” and “most wrong” are preferred.

2) Are there more examples for one syllable words which behave like the word "wrong"?

In the Cambridge grammar book that I use, they show examples for exceptions for two syllables that can get -er or -est (for example: quieter), but I didn't see that they mention any exception for one syllable rule (that should get -er or -est in the end in the comparative and superlative grades).


2 Answers 2


Many short (single syllable) adjectives have comparatives and superlatives that follow an -er -est pattern. Not all do.

"Fun" doesn't produce "funner". There doesn't seem to be a reason for this. You can say "more fun" and "the most fun"

"Fore" has as superlative "foremost" and no real comparative. It developed from splitting the prefix "fore" from words like "forebode", "forward", "forecast".

"Back" used to have a comparative "backer", it was dropped by 1500, instead say "further back".

Both "wrong" and "right" are rarely used as "wronger" or "righter".

I don't see a pattern here, so you will need to pick up experience of which adjectives do have a "-er" and "-est" form.

  • Thank you for the answer. How do you use comparative and superlative adjective for those short adjective that you mentioned? (back, fore or others?) Do use in more and most? (more back, most back) Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 0:47
  • You can usually use more/most, I've noted some variations already (eg not more back, but further back)
    – James K
    Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 19:23

I do not know of a rule regarding this, but we tend to shy away from double-R words like wronger, righter, and raucouser. Even a legitimate word like "rearward" will be expressed "behind" or "in the back of" rather than try to voice the double-R. At least for Americans, double-Rs are uncomfortable to voice.

  • 1
    Is worst the superlative of wrong? Generally "worst" is considered as a superlative of "bad". They appear to be cognate at the PIE level (from *wers-) but have independent meaning in Old English (wrong and wyrst)
    – James K
    Commented Apr 23, 2018 at 17:32
  • @JamesK, I'm willing to defer to your expertise, but I find it hard to believe any common speaker would disagree with me. Catija even uses it in this context in her comment, above. "That's the wrong way to do it" doesn't imply that the solution is the worst way to do it. "That's the worst way to do it" does. I've not heard anyone say "most wrong" in my life. However, in favor of your comment, "the worst way to do it" need not imply that the way is wrong, only that it's not as productive or efficient as another way. I suspect we could start a vigorous discussion among many with this...
    – JBH
    Commented Apr 23, 2018 at 17:41
  • @JamesK, because a supervisor would use the phrase in the context of "wrong according to estabilshed procedures."
    – JBH
    Commented Apr 23, 2018 at 17:42
  • 1
    Catija claims that worst is the irregular superlative of bad. She writes "Bad > worse >worst". I agree with Catija. You are claiming "wrong> more wrong > worst". I disagree with this. I claim that "worst is not a superlative form of wrong."
    – James K
    Commented Apr 23, 2018 at 18:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .