I have been asked to identify which word is incorrect. There are 4 choices- a,b,c, and d. The correct answer is "housing", but I don't know why. Could you please explain to me why "housing" is incorrect in this sentence.

Troops housing in Fort Bliss, Texas, train to operate aircraft equipment and artillery.

  • 1
    First of all, what are your thoughts on that? Why do you think housing as used in your sentence is correct/incorrect? – Michael Rybkin May 20 '18 at 3:24
  • I think "housing" could be " who house" , an sobordinate clause . – Kate Nguyen May 20 '18 at 3:30
  • Without more context, I'd say it should be 'housed'... but troops aren't housed, they're billeted. – gone fishin' again. May 20 '18 at 6:12

Why is "housing" incorrect in this sentence?

Because the verb "to house" has an active meaning "to put into a house", or "to give shelter to".

However the troops were not actively housing someone else. Rather, they were on the receiving end of the housing. Therefore a passive construction should be used such as "are housed". In this particular case the options are: "being housed" or just "housed".

Consider the difference between "they are fed" which is passive, and "they feed (the cats, etc)." which is active.

BTW - "stationed" might be a better word choice.

  • I'm not really sure this fully gets the 'correct answer' across; though the reasoning looks sound enough to me [I'm no grammarian]. However, "Troops are housed in Fort Bliss, Texas, train to..." doesn't work for me. – gone fishin' again. May 21 '18 at 5:35
  • @Tetsujin , edited – Sam May 21 '18 at 7:16
  • Cool. ahh, 'stationed'... yeah. I'm UKEng so my first thought was 'billeted' for military personnel, but 'stationed' would work too. – gone fishin' again. May 21 '18 at 7:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.